cross-posted from: https://poptalk.scrubbles.tech/post/2333639

I was just forwarded this someone in my household who watches our server. That’s it folks. I’ve been a hold out for a long time, but this is honestly it.

They want me to pay to stream content that I bought from my hardware transcoded also on my hardware.

I’ll say it. As of today, I say Plex is dead. Luckily I’ve been setting up Jellyfin, I guess it’s time to make it production ready.

Edit: I have a Plex Pass. More comments saying “Just buy a plex pass” are seriously not getting it. I have a Plex Pass and my users are still getting this.

And for the thousandth person who wants to say the same things to me:

  • YES I know I’m unaffected as a Plex Pass owner.
  • My users were immediately angry at it, which made me angry. Our users don’t understand what plex pass is, and they shouldn’t have to, that’s why I had it. The fact that they were pinged even though it should have kept working is horribly sloppy
  • Plex is still removing functionality. I don’t care that “People should pay their fair share”. If Plex wants to put every new feature behind a paywall, that’s completely okay. They are removing functionality.
    • “But they have cloud costs”. Remote streaming is negligible to them. It’s a dynamic DNS service. Plex client logs in, asks where server is, plex cloud responds with the IP and port of where server is located. That’s it.
    • “Good luck finding another remote streaming” - Again, Plex just opens up an IP and port. Jellyfin also just opens up an IP and port (Hold on jellyfin folks I know, security, that’s a separate conversation). All “remote streaming” is is their dynamic dns. Literal pennies to them. Know what actually is costing them money? Hosting all of that ad-supported “free” content that they’re probably losing money on.

In short, I don’t care how you justify it. Plex is doing something shitty. They’re removing functionality that has been free for years. I’m not responding to any more of your comments repeating the same arguments over and over.

  • Lucy :3@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    I never got the idea of selfhosting but paying (except for enterprise-grade support or donations) anyway.

      • SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I LOVE Jellyfin but can only imagine the amount of work I’d have to do if I tried to get my parents and in-laws successfully using it. We all just split the cost of lifetime Plex pass the last time it was on sale.

            • Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Do you mean the Facebook thing? I tried to Google the internet from the Facebooks and it didn’t work. I called Comcast and I told them the problem and now I have 400 TV channels. They took your computer box, said it was bad for security. Something about shredding it. Anyway, can you get the internet to Google for me?

      • L3G1T1SM3@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Outside of portforwarding plex ports on your router though? But yeah plex does provide a service and it is asinine the pushback this is getting.

      • Semperverus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Any time you rely on another company to handle your data, you are beholden to their whims, end of story. Don’t like what they’re doing? Too bad. Give up the convenience and host it yourself, or continue to be a slave to their corporate interests.

          • Semperverus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Been slowly chipping away at those for the last decade (could have gone way faster but I’m lazy), and I’m almost completely google-free. I dont use any microsoft products at home (work forces me to), and Apple can eat my ass. My phone is a completely de-googled GrapheneOS device (I don’t have an issue relying on companies for hardware, just software), and hopefully in the future a Liberux or Pinephone linux phone.

            I self-host my own movies, music, and cloud storage. I also host my own chat service for friends and family, built on top of XMPP. The services i do use are generally very privacy respecting like Signal for people outside of my social sphere, or freedom respecting like Lemmy (mostly weaned off of reddit).

      • LilB0kChoy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I run into you again! This time I get to wholeheartedly agree with you! You are spot on and nailed it.

        I use Plex for exactly the reasons you said because when I set it up I didn’t know anything about self hosting a media server and I wanted to share with family in other locations. I keep it because it’s so easy for my older, less tech savvy family members to access so I don’t have to be their support person for it.

        I’d consider Jellyfin if the end user access was more plug and play.

        The biggest thing about this is I don’t get why OP is so annoyed. If you have a Plex Pass you’re not impacted, you can still share and your users can still access your library for free, they can’t share with you without a Plex Pass but who cares.

        • Ulrich@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’d consider Jellyfin if the end user access was more plug and play.

          It’s about as plug and play as any other website. They just open the app, type in the URL, and log in with their credentials and…that’s it.

        • Pornacount128@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          How exactly are you aquiring a folder full of media without technical know how in the first place? (Genuine question?)

          I suppose having Plex handle users is easier than creating an account but barely imo.

          Not shitting on Plex either, gotta do what you want I think the problems with this kind of thing is the change, people had a free service for years and now they have to change or pay. People hate change, lol

          • shutz@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I’ve been “collecting” content for many years now. I learned most of what I needed to know about ripping and transcoding over the years, such that each time I need to deal with a new video format, or a new application, it’s not too hard, because I’m building on everything I’ve already learned.

            And each time I was learning new things, it’s not like there was a risk that all my previous content might suddenly become unusable or inaccessible.

            Meanwhile, a couple years ago I was finally able to build myself a proper NAS. While I know my way around Linux somewhat, I never kept a Linux-based daily driver because most of the apps I use regularly are on Windows, and I’m not confident about running them stably in Linux, nor am I confident about equivalent native Linux apps. And I’m not confident about setting up and administering my own server. My past experiences have shown me that whenever you need to do anything complex and specific, it involves a lot of work.

            So at a coworker’s suggestion, I got a Synology NAS that turned out to be a breeze to setup. And then I figured out how to get Plex server on there (not available in the Synology package manager, but the “manual” process turned out to be simple enough)

            And it just WORKS! it’s not perfect, but it’s mostly painless to use. I was happy paying for the lifetime Plex pass at the beginning, because it handles all the routing and discovery that needs to happen to allow me to stream to my phone, or to my parents’ TV when I’m visiting them.

            My next NAS might not be by Synology due to their recent announcement about supported hard drives, but I’ll probably be looking for something that “just works” because I can’t be bothered to learn how to be a sysadmin, and risk losing my stuff because I’m making the kinds of mistakes one makes as they’re learning.

            Just like, if I owned a car, I wouldn’t be digging under the hood to “tweak the timing” or replacing brake discs. I’d be happy paying someone I trust to do that work, leaving me with a car that “just works”.

    • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      In the case of plex, it’s not 100% selfhosted. There’s a dependence on plexs public infrastructure for user management/authentication. They also help bypass NAT by proxying connections through their servers so you don’t have to setup port forwarding and can even easily escape double NAT situations.

      I can understand paying for that convenience, but cost keeps rising while previously free features continue to get locked behind paywalls.

      Tbh, having users required to authenticate with plex.tv was enough for me to look elsewhere. The biggest reason to self host for me is to remove dependency on public services.

    • Flax@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Immich has a weird “buy a licence” model which literally does nothing.

      • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        Immich, I believe, is linked to Futo. And Futo has a license model that’s basically “if you like this app, and want to support the development, consider buying a license.”

        Sounds like it might be similar with Immich.

        Better than “donate to this project”, since a license seems more like the user is getting something out of it, even if it’s basically a glorified donation 😂

    • 9point6@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      For a good while, Plex was the only game in town that did the job well, and they put the transcoding feature behind the paywall.

      Given it wasn’t that expensive for a lifetime pass a number of years ago (I remember it was cheaper than a game anyway) and they still seemed relatively user-centric at the time, many people like me felt like they were supporting developers building something that was useful to us.

      I still run my Plex server since it’s not really costing me not to, but I’ve been running Jellyfin too for a little while and it more or less can do the same job these days

      • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.techOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yup, for the time it was worth it. I got about 7 years out of my “lifetime” plex pass, and I got it on sale. All in all, I won’t say the money was wasted.

        It’s 100% a waste if anyone pays for that BS monthly streaming fee though.

        • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Wait so you’ve got a lifetime plex pass already? Then literally nothing changes for you or anyone that is streaming from your server.

      • Lyra_Lycan@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I put my chips (£100) on Emby.

        I haven’t regretted my purchase. I can’t sell anyone on much either, because Emby does all the same as other services, except they’ve kept adding features while Plex kept doing the Google thing and taking them away. CPU transcoding is free I believe, as is remote streaming up to 10 devices for each user… Idk I paid pretty early on, but lifetime license is where it’s at. Subscriptions just open your asshole for greedy CEOs to fuck you. Best to keep subscriptions voluntary, like donating on Github or Patreon

        • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Emby was borne out of classic workplace toxicity, in that Jellyfin was becoming too corporate so a couple devs forked off to keep it clean.

          I think you have that backwards. Jellyfin is a fork of emby

    • defunct_punk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      You can selfhost for free however you want but software developers have the right to ask for money to use their software. I selfhost about 60tb of media and have paid for Plex monthly for about 10 years now. They are still so far above the competition for ease-of-use that I wouldn’t even consider switching at this point, even to save $7/month.

      • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.techOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        They have the right to ask, but I don’t have to pay. I’ve been playing with Jellyfin for about a month now, and I have to say, it’s just as easy as Plex is. The only thing I had to do myself was make my own users. In fact, I tried Jellyfin a few years ago and was unimpressed - now all I see is Plex making stuff to make advertisers happy while Jellyfin is adding stuff to make it’s users happy, to the point where I think Jellyfin has surpassed Plex.

        • SayCyberOnceMore@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          But would you / do you voluntarily donate to Jellyfin’s development?

          I get it, it is (& a lot of things are) free… but at some point the developers need to recoup something

          Otherwise Jellyfin’s development will eventually dry up as raw enthusiasm runs out.

        • defunct_punk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          All fair points, just depends on where your motivation to self host comes from. $7 for a monthly sub to Plex is frankly nothing to me, I don’t even have the charge linked to my budget spreadsheet. Between Plex, VPN, my usenet provider, private tracker memberships, electricity, etc., I’m not even sure I’m saving much money versus having one or two streaming subscriptions. In other words, I don’t do it to save money.

          PlexAmp alone justifies the cost even before some features got put behind a paywall but the fact that all my tech-illiterate friends can just download an app on their phones/consoles and watch whatever they want in a high bitrate off my computer makes it worth it for me. 9/10, I just watch films off VLC player anyway.

    • chaospatterns@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      With Plex, you’re getting the easy ability to grant access to users. You get a single pane that can search across multiple Plex instances, and NAT traversal/port forwarding. Jellyfin makes you figure that out yourself.

      • NotKyloRen@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s not exactly difficult if you use Tailscale or really any VPN. So I really don’t see the value for the cost; if you’re even considering self hosting a Plex server/instance, there’s a list of basic knowledge you should have or learn (like what you mentioned).

        • chaospatterns@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Its not difficult for technical people like you or me, but my friend who just wants to watch their favorite show on my Plex on their TV won’t know how to traffic engineer the traffic over a Tailscale network to my network. My mom won’t be installing Tailscale on her laptop and phone.

          • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            As long as the technical person does all of the setup on their end, the non technical person only has to enter a domain and port in their jellyfin client.

            • thundermoose@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              If you want to be on the hook for all IT requests from folks you share with, this is a fine approach. There are people out there who honestly don’t have a problem with that and more power to them. I doubt they are the majority, and a lot of selfhosters completely ignore this aspect of software. There is a reason non-free services exist beyond just “capitalism bad.” I mean, capitalism indeed bad, but your time is worth something.

              • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                I guess I haven’t noticed that. The non technically literate folk I know use smart TVs, or can download Jellyfin from an app store. Then they just use the URL when the app asks for it.

                There’s no other configuring to do on their end.

    • legion02@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Doesn’t jellyfin just not do this at all? Like if you want to stream remotely you need to figure out a vpn solution to do it?

      • Semperverus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        You can stream remotely via jellyfin if you expose your server to the internet. VPN is safer but not the only option.

        • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yeah, no way. Jellyfins Backend is like an open barn door. And with the kind of content most of us here offer through either Jellyfin or Plex, I wouldn’t want to open up like that.

        • legion02@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Completely unreasonable to need to walk people through this. It’s OK to say jellyfin can’t do remote access.

        • themachine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          That is not correct. A VPN would be one method but you can also just expose the service to the internet in a number of ways and accomplish the same thing Plex provides.

          • mobotsar@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            You probably shouldn’t just expose jellyfin to the internet quite yet though. There are some ongoing efforts to fix unauthenticated endpoint problems.

      • charles@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        You’re 100% correct. I always find it funny how hardcore some people are with jellyfin vs Plex. I’ll probably end up getting downvotes on this but imo Plex is way simpler to setup and keep running, and as a lifetime pass owner, I’ve very rarely felt like my experience has been deteriorated by any of the changes that the jellyfin crowd freaks out about. Plus plexamp is honestly such a great music player. I’ll happily keep running Plex for the foreseeable future.

  • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I got the same email.

    I haven’t had plex installed for over 7 years, and I’ve NEVER used the shared libraries feature.

    We noticed that you’ve accessed libraries from friends and family in the past

    They’ve apparently noticed activity that’s never occurred.

      • 0^2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        As a server owner, you should be keeping an eye on tos and updates/changes to the software you use. You probably got an email but ignored it?

  • Xanza@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Seems like it was only a matter of time.

    20% more will jump to Jellyfin. The other 80% will entrench and talk even more about how great Plex is. I mean Jesus, $250 to watch pirated movies. lol wtf It’s also fucking wild to me that people are defending a monetization model that is on self hosted hardware. Like, I gotta pay for my server and then a license to avoid buying DVDs. Fuck it, at this point just buy the fucking movie.

    Ya’ll are brain dead. Plex loves you tho.

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.techOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yup, read through this thread and it becomes clearer and clearer. and trust me, I’ve been a long time hold out, I’ve been through this many times - but this is the first time I’ve seen functionality removed from Plex to be put behind a paywall. And doing a price hike at the same time. Absolutely shitty. I’ve already migrated off.

      • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        You have a plex pass though, so nothing changed for you - you just got all angry because you didn’t read the email properly.

        Your users are going to be much worse off now than they were, and you will absolutely lose a bunch of them who don’t want to (or can’t) have to connect to a VPN every time they want to stream from your library.

        • cyberwolfie@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Why would they need to connect to a VPN every time they connect to Jellyfin?

          • vithigar@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Jellyfin has some security issues that, depending on who you ask, are either critical vulnerabilities that make it completely unsafe to expose to the Internet or largely unconcerning for regular users.

            • cyberwolfie@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              I’m not overly concerned about my instance running behind a reverse proxy. Perhaps I am just naive…

              • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                Honestly yeah. The Jellyfin Backend is basically unauthenticated for a large part, allowing anyone to map and stream your content as soon as they guessed the ids, which isn’t that hard, since they are based on the paths on your device. So if your movie sits in /mnt/media/movies/the_bee_movie that is pretty esay to guess and calculate the id from, allowing anyone to stream that content from your server

                • cyberwolfie@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  And apart from an undesirable bandwidth usage resulting from someone guessing their way to my file structure, how can this be used to compromise my server?

        • dogs0n@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          you will absolutely lose a bunch of them

          I always see this and I have to ask: why do you care?

          They likely aren’t paid customers of yours, if they don’t follow your rules and the software you like to use, then they are free to use any other method of consuming media.

          VPN

          Have to agree with the other comment that asks why do you need to use a vpn. Fax

          • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I always see this and I have to ask: why do you care?

            Because OP is scared of losing their users because of their incorrect thinking that Plex was requiring them all to buy a remote streaming pass, so clearly OPs goal is to not lose their users, right?

            OP asked, we’re answering. That’s kinda the whole point of this thing called Lemmy. We don’t care per se, we’re just telling OP our opinions and thoughts on their questions and proposed solutions.

            Have to agree with the other comment that asks why do you need to use a vpn. Fax

            If you don’t use a VPN you’re putting yourself at risk. There’s no real way around it with Jellyfin, as others have said.

            • dogs0n@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Sorry, I wasn’t clear. When I said “why do you care?”, I didn’t mean YOU specifically with OPs potential problem of losing users.

              I meant why do people in general, who self-host software for friends/family, care if their friends/family stop using the software.

              E.g. I have friends on Plex, but for whatever reason, I decide I want to move to Jellyfin. My friends stop streaming my media because they dont like jellyfin for whatever their own reasons may be. I personally wouldn’t care about losing them as “users”, because it’s not like they are paying customers. I let them access my instance for free, if they aren’t bothered enough to use it, then thats on them, not me to cater to their needs by keeping Plex around.

              Hope that cleared up my meaning. I wasn’t attacking you for caring with your original response.

              p.s. you are at risk by hosting Plex too, just in different ways. Plex still requires your server is open to the internet, right? Even if only Plex’s servers can access it, who’s to say Plex themselves don’t get hacked. Always a risk/reward type deal with hosting software, in my opinion, either are fine to expose.

    • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s also fucking wild to me that people are defending a monetization model that is on self hosted hardware.

      It’s wild to me that people who claim to be tech savvy don’t understand that Plex Server, the software, is what makes Plex what it is and as popular as it is. No other solution exists that is as easy as Plex and as secure as Plex. Jellyfin, Emby, Kodi, etc are nowhere near as simple to use and don’t have the breadth of app support that Plex does. Plex is basically on every device anyone owns. They sign in and they can stream from everyones libraries. No VPNs needed, no other hoops.

      I paid like $100 for a lifetime Plex Pass like 10 years ago. The 2 dozen friends and family that share my server don’t pay a cent and this changes nothing.

      • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        This.

        I just set up Plex for my mom on her bargain bin cheapo android TV. It had the plex app right there and it’ll play without transcoding.

        Can’t do that with Jellyfin.

      • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        This place sucks at times as it becomes clear it’s just an echo chamber that we used to call the Donald for.

        My users don’t like the UI of Jellyfin as it isn’t as polished as Plex. I do this for my users and although it costs me money, it does save them a whole lot more money and means they’re taken out of some capitalist systems which should be the goal no?

        I also have the cost of a VPN too.

        Edit: The comment I replied to was on -6 upvotes at the time of posting.

        • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I use jellyfin, and jellyfin is not safe to expose to the internet.

          They have a handful of vulnerability and security holes that have been open for like 5+ years now. And the old emby architecture is quite difficult to work with.

          • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            And they actively refuse to do anything about them because it would force clients to update. You could just just as well open an unsecured ftp server to your content

          • kylian0087@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            A load of those so called vulnerabilities are way overblown and in most cases require you to be logged in anyway.

              • kylian0087@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                That is with any piece of software. their will always be some vulnerabilities that are very bad. so by your definition using any piece of software is a concern.

                • dogs0n@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I agree with you, it’s likely this vulnerability is only known because Jellyfin is open source… how many are hiding in Plex’s proprietary source code…

                  Anyways when has anyone ever been pwnd by this “exploit”, I have seriously never heard of anyone being “hacked” by one of them.

                  Definitely overblown as far as I am aware… don’t post your instance url all over the internet and you will likely be fine.

                  Using Plex (is fine, do whatever u want) and giving them your data instead doesn’t really help you (or at least sending your data through them).

        • HamstersAreLowCarb@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          My users don’t like the UI of Jellyfin as it isn’t as polished as Plex.

          The UIs are nearly identical, though.

      • Xanza@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        No other solution exists that is as easy as Plex and as secure as Plex.

        Entrenchment. This is a profoundly absurd statement.

        I paid like $100 for a lifetime Plex Pass like 10 years ago.

        You paid $100 to access software hosted on your own devices. That’s wonderful you think that’s a great idea. I’m sure the Plex devs love you and would kiss you right on the mouth.

        They sign in and they can stream from everyones libraries. No VPNs needed, no other hoops.

        Because you’re vendor locked in… lol.

        • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I paid $100 to play Forza Horizon on my own device too - should that have been free?

          This is a profoundly absurd statement.

          That no other solution exists that is as easy and secure as Plex? That’s not just absurd, but profoundly absurd? What other solution is there that is?

          Your entire argument seems to be that software should be free if it’s on your own device, which is a profoundly absurd statement. The only paid software should be on hardware you don’t own?

          • Xanza@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            I paid $100 to play Forza Horizon on my own device too - should that have been free?

            This is a complete false equivalence and I feel that you know that. The idea of a console is to expand it by buying new games. That’s not unexpected.

            Your entire argument seems to be that software should be free

            I am a software developer. The argument isn’t that software should be free. The argument is that this is an exceptionally poor business model and as a developer I’m disgusted that people are defending it. The VC which owns Plex and other VCs will use this “logic” that you have to move the goal posts further, and further, and further, and further until there’s no such thing as free software anymore. And I think that’s fucked up.

            At the end of the day you’re paying twice to avoid buying IP. Just fucking buy the IP if you’re going to be stupid. Movies are like $12. At $250 you’re paying $2.10/mo in addition to your hosting costs.

            Just go buy 20 movies for the same price. It’s so dumb.

            • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              This is a complete false equivalence and I feel that you know that. The idea of a console is to expand it by buying new games. That’s not unexpected.

              It’s not though. The idea of self hosting isn’t to not have any software costs associated with it. Domain names aren’t free. VPNs (that you use to aquire content) aren’t free. Cloud backups aren’t free. Would you prefer everything was free? Absolutely. Do you sometimes have to pay to get the best software for the job? Absolutely, and Plex is that software.

              I am a software developer.

              Same here! That makes your argument even crazier to me! Someone demanding that your software should be free and should never be changed to be paid even if it means the company goes under is bananas.

              The argument is that this is an exceptionally poor business model and as a developer I’m disgusted that people are defending it.

              The business model of having the people that use their main product that requires the most development and time and resources, Plex Server, pay either a cheap one off fee (that regularly goes on sale for half price) or a monthly subscription fee in order to use it, is “exceptionally poor”? How so? Is it just that it was free? This business model has been around for eternity. Get people in the door and hooked by offering it for free, then start charging for it. It’s one of the actual best business models around, not “exceptionally poor” lol. You’re looking at it from the “I want it to be free forever” point of view, not the “We need it to be a viable business with revenue to be able to sustain it” point of view.

              until there’s no such thing as free software anymore.

              That will never happen, because people will always be making free software to put out there for people to try and to use - and many of them will then transition to PAID because it’s not sustainable otherwise. For software to thrive you often have to have full time developers working on it, and full time developers need to be paid.

              At the end of the day you’re paying twice to avoid buying IP. Just fucking buy the IP if you’re going to be stupid. Movies are like $12. At $250 you’re paying $2.10/mo in addition to your hosting costs.

              Just go buy 20 movies for the same price. It’s so dumb.

              I paid ~$100 ~10 years ago for Plex Pass. It paid for itself instantly as I was simply supporting the developers of the software. As a software developer I have no problem doing that. I wasn’t forced to buy it, but I did.

              I’m not quite sure where you got this $250 figure from though? What is that, the monthly remote pass x 12? Also most people running a plex server get far more than 20 movies a year lol. Pretty sure I got 20 movies last night.

    • aim_at_me@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I dunno man, I don’t care much, when Plex gets shitty enough I’ll jump. But paying for the ongoing maintenance of software isn’t some evil thing, even if I self host it.

      • merthyr1831@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        You’re not paying for software maintenance, you’re paying a subscription service to a private company that has already decided to cut back on features that others also thought they were paying to maintain.

        If you want to actually pay for software maintenance, migrate to Jellyfin and pay them instead, rather than filtering your payments through middle managers and shareholders first.

        • Legume5534@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Many of us bought lifetime passes ages ago though so we’re not paying a subscription.

      • Xanza@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        But paying for the ongoing maintenance of software isn’t some evil thing, even if I self host it.

        But that’s not what you’re paying for. You’re paying for access to that software…

        • aim_at_me@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I know. And some of that money, funds development, and some of that development includes security.

  • thundermoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    This will affect any server that does not already have a Plex Pass/ Lifetime Plex Pass. If your server does not have one, your remote users will have to pay. The service Plex provides is still worth it though, it largely just works on dozens of platforms and that shit isn’t free to make.

    Sharing a Jellyfin server with others remotely is still a lot more complicated than it needs to be to compete (no, it’s not as simple as opening a port, and if you think so then you’re either lucky or you aren’t sharing with lots of folks). I run both and I would never try to share Jellyfin with non-technical people. Honestly, I wish Jellyfin would start offering an optional paid relay service to fund their development. They could use the revenue to improve their app ecosystem and still produce mostly open-source software. Homeassistant does this with Nabu Casa and it’s great!

    That being said, the new Plex Android app kinda sucks ass. If there was anything that would make me switch it wouldn’t be having to pay for software, or services it’d be a garbage experience on my most common platform.

    • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Jellyfin takes more work, but can be a “simple” end user experience if you set it up for them.

      Use a reverse proxy to get a letsenceypt cert for your jellyfin server. SWAG, Caddy, lots of options. Then setup a free tailscale account and add your jellyfin server to your tailnet. Install the jellyfin and tailscale apps on the user android tv/apple tv/computer, then enroll the devices in your tailnet.

      They will have always on, ssl secured, vpn protected media sharing for free.

      • thundermoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah, I’m not interested in setting all that up and maintaining it for every user I share with. For myself, this is exactly how I access Jellyfin remotely, but I am not explaining to my remote family members how to set up a VPN on their TV.

    • Lemmchen@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Huh? I share my Jellyfin instance to people that are as tech savvy as a Neanderthal and besides some rare hickups everything works acceptably.

      • thundermoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        All I can say is that is not at all like my experience with Jellyfin. Every person I’ve ever shared it with wanted to go back to Plex. Most complaints had to do with the jankiness of the various apps. Lots of issues with the UIs acting funny, a few connection drops, and some settings not getting respected. I do also recall an episode of Severance that would not stream in the correct color space in Jellyfin but worked perfectly in Plex.

  • TheFANUM @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I’ve been a lifetime Plex pass holder since forever. And that even covers my brother accessing the server? He doesn’t even need one?

    Seems fair to me for a platform I use daily for a decade.

    • defunct_punk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Indeed. The entitlement that some folks online have towards Plex is embarrassing sometimes.

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.techOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      I don’t know if you’re trying to exclaim that it doesn’t cover it, or that it’s a fair thing.

      I’m a Plex pass holder on my server - and my user does not have a plex pass. From what I’m reading they need to pay a subscription to access my (Plex pass) server.

      • i_stole_ur_taco@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Read the email again. The key word in their marketing slop is “alternatively”. You have a Plex Pass and are the server admin. Your users need to do nothing.

        Unfortunately, that does mean I have to respond to messages from all my users asking what that email means and convince them they can just ignore it.

        A second “nice” part of this change is that iOS users no longer have to buy the Plex app on the App Store to stream longer than a minute. The app is only like 5 bucks one time, but it was a barrier when trying to convince stubborn people to just fucking TRY my Plex server.

  • cantankerous_cashew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    It was only a matter of time. Plex is a Series C startup, employs 100+ people, and has taken substantial VC investment. Those investors are expecting exponential returns, and a “one-time lifetime payment” will never sustain that sort of growth

  • secret300@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    Oh no a paid, proprietary, piece of shit software does something shitty. Who could’ve ever saw this coming?!

    I’ve said it for years anytime anyone mentioned running a Plex server. As soon as you install that on your server or your homelab it’s no longer your server. Proprietary software is malware

  • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    As long as the library owner has a Plex Pass nothing changes for ANYONE who is streaming from that Plex Server.

  • xodoh74984@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    I don’t see this talked about much anymore, but the day Plex added telemetry in 2017 was the day I became five-alarm desperate for an alternative. Had to wait a 2-3 years with Plex’s telemetry IP’s and domains blacklisted before Jellyfin was mature enough for me to make the change.

    How Plex users can be comfortable with any telemetry is beyond me.

  • sj_zero@lotide.fbxl.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    I started on Plex and even considered a lifetime Plex pass, but I felt like it was more interested in showing their content than my content. It was a lot of effort just to show music and movies.

    My family and I use jellyfin every day now, and a key thing is it starts off boring but it shows your music, your movies, your books, your photos.

    For folks who migrate who were paying, consider a donation to projects you make heavy use of. They don’t usually have big companies behind them and can use the help.

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.techOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Exactly how I’ve felt. I paid for a pass a long time ago, when they were actively making features for us server owners - but lately it’s been a good 80-90% of their crap content and very little for server owners. I’m not even upset about their content really, it’s just they blately have ignored everything else. It’s shifted, and so I have to as well.