Oh yeah. I can sign under every word you wrote

Well, we should automate everything that can be automated - for the benefit of everyone. Last part is something not seen on worldwide scale ever, just yet

Wow. Idiots being idiots. The guy tried to play with legal rules and - surprise - lost. I am glad you got out of there in time

Oh yeah. It takes experience and clear head to remember to account for all the inevitables that are going to happen besides actual dev-hours-to-create-this. A hard lesson I am still learning

Ooh yeah, my favourite “I will vibe code it” route :)

Made me want to become that notorious software architect, just to be the reason that “X is going to take Y days. Want faster? Change your fucking expectations/scope of X”

I am at “no fucking yays and the bunch, check the package create/update dates, read PKGBUILD, only update when necessary”. Has served me well so far

Same. Unless I live like a hermit in the woods, I am definitely using, directly or not, something (many things) made by a company that has done unforgivable shit. And even if I personally decide “to hell with all this, I can survive just fine”, who will be there to stop them from destroying the whole forest I am supposedly in? Definitely not me

This does not make things all right as they stand, but it does mean quitting the game is not an option

So that’s why they went “you liked vertical desktops? now you will like horizontal layout. Don’t thank us”

After his fellas have demonstrated plain and clear that “recorded and reported” means nothing as long as you have enough money?

Haaa, go on and try that

Thanks for notifying, I hate to know it’s true (no insult intended)

One good thing AI bubble did: it showed me we have so many rich idiots that it is an actual problem

I am. It washes my body (as in corporeal form)

All that and you still think that “doesn’t work” is the only problem that can happen?

Someone hasn’t done enough debugging in their life. I wish the lesson be as painless as possible

He better not have his spine poked by anything sharp :)

(in cade I failed at it: reference to Midra)

Nah. A bunch of llm code review agents say that produced code is of high quality, fire anyone who said it would have taken for them to implement same functionality more time than I have spent

Not the best description doesn’t cut it, it’s just false description. I can easily write a system with 100% test coverage, bugged as hell and containing so many weird abstraction tricks that it takes a significant effort to figure out even what is happening in the simplest scenario. And yes, part of that hundred percent coverage is going to be llm style: test that something does what you already know it does

Guess he didn’t rape enough children then

Good for you then :)