lastweakness

Yep, very dumb… And no plans anywhere from anyone to genuinely fix it either.

Maybe I should have clarified, you can’t export from Bitwarden into KeePassXC or vice versa. Imagine you have 100 passkeys and you want to switch your passkeys manager. Unless something has changed drastically in the last few months, this was impossible

This is, imo, the bigger issue. No clean way to export and move passkeys around, even between the open source options like Bitwarden and Proton Pass or as plain backups…

What about high effort slop? Seems like a new category that’s growing unfortunately…

I mean, they do give a single toggle that disables every AI feature (new and old) at once… I think that’s pretty good

If you have money to spare, the form factor is kinda nice

I’m not the one who started a sentence with “with every intention to offend”… But sure. Also, you might want to look into what “ad hominem” means.

just wanna say everyone here that GNOME isn’t that good.

Except we weren’t talking or asking about how much better KDE is for you. I genuinely don’t care since I already love both desktops. Unlike you, I’m not here to shit on one or the other.

We were discussing the flexibility offered by GNOME’s extensions, which you, with your limited understanding, declared to be something that KDE can match, when that’s just plain untrue just by virtue of how extensions work. You also implied that GNOME core devs are careless about extensions, which they are not. It’s just how GNOME extensions work. It’s a tradeoff for the flexibility, one they’ve tried their best for years to mitigate including offering porting guides. You can take offense to being told you’re ignorant about all of this. But once again, that doesn’t change how reality works.

That all said, I agree that I don’t have the time or energy for this either. But as a software engineer, I really wish people wouldn’t bring in their “opinions” when facts about a piece of software are being discussed… Anyway, i won’t be replying here anymore, so bye

I mean, you can say anything you want. Just doesn’t change reality. GNOME devs do a lot these days to prevent updates from breaking extensions.

KDE also simply doesn’t allow everything GNOME allows. I love KDE and I have past contributions to KDE as well. But pretending they’re on the same level of customizability is delusional. It’s not a helpful or meaningful statement to make, a statement born out of pure ignorance. Plus, you dragged KDE into this, not me. Not everything needs to be a fking desktop war for no fking reason.

Yes, KDE included. I don’t think you understand the level of flexibility that being able to monkey-patch the GNOME shell provides. And I say that as someone who loves both KDE and GNOME for different reasons.

I honestly find it odd that anyone brings up “no choices” and “lack of customisation” as a point against GNOME at all… Nothing in any desktop environment comes close to the versatility of GNOME extensions.

Chromium (or blink), not webkit

Video is bloat

Was it BIOS or UEFI?

Yeah, perfect analogy. No amount of external helper tools making installs from GitHub easier would change the security implications. (Cargo-binstall is an example of such a helper.)

I use Arch, btw. But no, I wouldn’t blame my incompetence on my distro even if I were infected, which I wasn’t.

deleted by creator

I’d use it if it’s as good as systemd.

Looks interesting

How is Rust not problematic? Cargo has the same risks involved afaik

Have you tried Stump?