• 2 Posts
  • 521 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 19th, 2023

help-circle
  • For me, distinguish similar letters such as 0, O, I, l, 1. Then I want ligature because I like them, then emojis should align vertically to the grid, high resolution for small font sizes, size difference between tall and not-tall characters, and it shouldn’t have narrow characters.

    Last time when I was changing up the font I went to https://www.nerdfonts.com/font-downloads and tried out a couple until I found one that I liked. I’m really picky about the symbol shapes, I most often just bail on a font because the @, % or & is ugly I might also bail if ` vs ’ is not distinct enough.

    Some fonts have absolutely wild italics that are almost cursive which is a hard pass. Even though I only see it once every week maybe I’m just not up for it.



  • Since there’s no lack of solutions here I’m going to add one more. If you manage to create bash to update the containers then you can have it run with a systemd service that’s easy to set up. It’s very easy to set up and it’ll work the same as running the command no your computer.










  • I got a hot take on this. People are treating AI as a fire and forget tool when they really should be treating it like a junior dev.

    Now here’s what I think, it’s a force multiplier. Let’s assume each dev has a profile of…

    2x feature progress, 2x tech debt removed 1x tech debt added.

    Net tech debt adjusted productivity at 3x

    Multiply by AI for 2 you have a 6x engineer

    Now for another case, but a common one 1x feature, net tech debt -1.5x = -0.5x comes out as -1x engineer.

    The latter engineer will be as fast as the prior in cranking out features without AI but will make the code base worse way faster.

    Now imagine that the latter engineer really leans into AI and gets really good at cranking out features, gets commended for it and continues. He’ll end up just creating bad code at an alarming pace until the code becomes brittle and unweildy. This is what I’m guessing is going to happen over the next years. More experienced devs will see a massive benefit but more junior devs will need to be reined in a lot.

    Going forward architecture and isolation of concerns will be come more important so we can throw away garbage and rewrite it way faster.






  • At the start I just wanted a desktop machine that runs Steam through sunshine/moonlight so hardware support and gaming stuff such was very important.

    My homelab used to run on my laptop when it could all fit within a couple 100s of GB and I was the only user but moving it was tricky. Since I’m a programmer I’m not afraid of this stuff so I just spent the hours to figure out one problem at a time.

    I ended up figuring out adding HDD whitelist in SELinux, make it accessible in podman, manually edit fstab because tools didn’t work, systemd service for startup, logging in automatically where I already forgot everything and would have not had to do any of this on a bog standard Ubuntu server.



  • As much as I don’t like AI I don’t blame him for using it. Opensource is a thankless sector where maintainers put in massive amount of work for nothing in return. If AI is helping him then all the power to him.

    That being said we don’t know how AI code generated currently will age. We know how the code 3 years ago ended up being slop of hard to maintain code but modern models are a lot more competent. Maybe he shouldn’t have removed the coauthored by Claude thingy but in the end it’s him using a tool and verifying it’s output.

    I used lutris back in the day for playing rocket league and I’d also use it today. I feel we should give this guy the benefit of the doubt for now. If in the future Lutris becomes less stable we should absolutely blame AI but until then I’ll hold off on my judgement.