

In this case, it’s probably comparing AMD with some ARM based thingy.
“then” is used to depict time, sequence or a causal relationship. “than” is used with comparative adjectives, to depict comparison.


In this case, it’s probably comparing AMD with some ARM based thingy.


I initially followed on their plans for that thing and from what I remember, they were going to include the older ones too.
But I’d think they would at least be willing to do something trivial like a rebuild for a big name like CERN, if they just called ‘support’.
“trivial”, because it doesn’t require many expensive man-hours, just an additional entry in whatever batch build config they use.
Considering how I end up saying worse, when I get 100+ line changes of code with a commit message that only illustrates 1 of the changes, I don’t think I care about anyone being “adjusted”.


Client Server
This seems like the correct link:
https://pulkomandy.tk/_/_Life/_A bicycle for the mind


What if they run a rebase script that changes the timestamp or sth on every commit, before the reupload?


Why are your company hiring such lazy devs?
(Interrogatory) Statement of the decade.


It’s not Open Source.
The other guy is being paid to push that slop. And he’s paying out of that, for AI cloud services.


AI “brainwashed” me into hating it, by increasing the amount of work I needed to do to fix the AI user’s code.


- Allows any and all LLM use provided that:
- the tools are not legally problematic
- the LLM output does not violate another copyright
- the contributor assumes full responsibility
- they’re not used for bulk operations without prior discussion
- private data is not sent to cloud services
So, filtering out > 90% of cheap slop?
I would like something like point 3, with “for everything” replaced with option 2.


Yeah, let’s use infectious diseases for socialising with people.
Cough on the face of the person you want to say hello to… Wait… People already do that.


which gets rarer when you go into a technical career
Sorry, what?
I have found it hard to find a place with a non-bulshitting trend.
And it has become harder, the further I go.
Maybe I’m just unlucky.


So, if I were to do a bad re-encode, the result would be copyright-free?
Or not, because I didn’t pass it through AI?
Truly dumb laws.


Don’t ask us, ask AI.
Klearly you are not a KDE Kontributor.


There was a doctor who said to me, “computer games can be addictive”. This was after I told her I play games, so she was pretty much implying that I was getting addicted. This was when I hadn’t played for over a month due to lack of time from my 9 to 6:30 job.
The same doctor bragged about how she couldn’t go about her day without drinking coffee right after waking up.
She said those 2 things within the same 5 minutes.


The effects of technology do not occur at the level of opinions or concepts, but alter sense ratios or patterns of perception steadily and without any resistance.
This is a nice one.
And I see it happening right in front of my eyes at work.
‘How it is used’ will defer by the individual and specially for new tools, there will always be a generation of suffering.
Project Management, Jira/scrum etc had one (I’d say, still ongoing for most workplaces, that haven’t figured out the correct match). This one will too; probably more of it.


Because it is easier to read large codebases of Python than large codebases of Bash.


Loved the “for AI only” Section.
Is “already” really the word to use.
Don’t vehicles need the investigation being done before getting on the road?
I’d say the investigation started a bit too late.