Tech CEOs want us to believe that generative AI will benefit humanity. They are kidding themselves

  • hglman@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It will shift a lot of human effort from generative to review. For example the core role of an engineer in many ways already is validation of a plan. Well that will become nearly the only role.

    • rustyspoon@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      the core role of an engineer in many ways already is validation of a plan.

      I disagree, this implies that AI are doing a lot more than they actually are. Before you design the physical layout of some thing, you have to identify a problem, and identify guidelines and empirical metrics against which you can compare your design to determine efficacy. This is half the job for engineers.

      There’s one step of the design process that I see current AI completing autonomously (implementation), and I view it as nontrivial to get the technology working higher up on the “V”.

    • ABoxOfNeurons@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That assumes that the classes of problems that AI’s can solve remains stagnant. I don’t think that’s a good assumption, especially given that GPT4 can already self-review and refine its output.

      • hglman@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It will take a very long time for people to believe and trust AI. That’s just the nature of trust. It may well surpass humant in always soon, but trust will take much more time. What would be required for an AI designed bridge be accepted without review by a human engineer?