• brsrklf@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Capacitive buttons on anything are annoying, they’re unreliable as fuck. They might trigger with the slightest accidental touch, but then they’ll act like your finger doesn’t exist for a dozen pushes.

    • kusivittula@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      and why do they have to be everywhere? we have an induction stove and it has capacitive buttons for some idiotic reason. so many problems! when you boil water, little drops are always landing on the buttons. and to reduce power from max to min, you need to hold the - button for like a full minute. wiping the stove with a wet towel makes it go BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP and it won’t shut up! and finally, when my cats walk on the buttons, they always manage to turn it on. i miss knobs.

      • brsrklf@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yes, so much yes. I’ve got that on mine too, and it’s a pain. it has very small, close “buttons” too, setting the temperature is an exercise in accuracy, when it reacts at all.

        And yes, the tiniest drop of water fucks everything up completely.

      • aramova@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yeah I’m remodeling and literally refuse to buy anything that doesn’t have physical controls in the kitchen.

        Fuck touch controls on everything.

  • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    I got a loaner while my car was being fixed a while ago. The volume control on the wheel was touch sensitive. I would swipe it and blow my ears out while turning.

    Worst. Idea. Ever.

  • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Im of the opinion controls for cars should be designed more like controls for airplanes. Every gage and button in that cockpit is where it is and points where it points to be able to convey a lot of information with a quick glance and allow you to interact as quickly and easily as you can read them. Marketing gimicks that remove layers of tactile response to esential controls don’t belong in heavy machinery.

    • kurcatovium@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Todays cars cockpit layouts are straight out dangerous for the roads tbh. Forcing you to point your eyes to some shitty display somewhere to turn down your AC, then try to tap tiny buttons and hope you won’t tap on something else, instead of looking at a road in front of you? How is that even allowed ffs?!

    • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Touch controls are becoming increasingly common in airplanes and then backed up by mouse cursors. Flight critical controls still need to be backed by physical hardware but stuff like route planning etc is now almost entirely touch based. For light sports aircraft’s even flight critical stuff can be approved as touch controls. Look at the G3X or Dynon SkyView. They both have some form of dial-based backup controls, but it’s clearly designed for touch first.

  • ladicius@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Can confirm that these buttons on the steering wheel of the id4 are really, really dangerous bullshit. I regularly drive those cars as rentals, and I’ve never (not “rarely” - it’s really never) faced a worse decision on buttons in any device I ever handled. Those touchpads are solely the reason I despise all VW-cars - they are complete crap. (I use these cars only for short trips and never activate any system by these buttons after encountering numerous dangerous situations as described in the article.)

  • kamen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Shouldn’t automotive catch a hint from the fact that the only mainstream capacitive control devices are phones and tablets - something that you’re constantly looking at while operating?

    • sqibkw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      They know.

      Capacitive touch sensors are WAY cheaper than physical buttons, and aren’t nearly as prone to mechanical flaws. Plus they can market them as “newer”!

      Car companies only care about your safety as much as it affects their bottom line. It’s unfortunately commonplace for there to be known fatal flaws which occur infrequently enough that it’s cheaper to just pay out the injured/killed victims than to issue a recall. Driving is inherently dangerous - any car companies that tried to fix everything would go bankrupt, or at least be squeezed out by those that don’t.

      Now, if only there were a way to build the places we live so that we didn’t need to take on the risk of driving so frequently…

  • blarth@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    How would these be causing crashes? The ID.4 has a few cruise control buttons on the left side of the steering wheel. They are push buttons, but you can swipe the speed up or down to change it to the next 5 MPH. The resume button is not capacitive as the article states, you have to push it. Once again, this seems like people not wanting to take responsibility for their own lack of attention while driving and blaming it on the tech in the vehicle.

    • iamjackflack@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I mean they literally were talking about multiple ways. Someone could hit a stereo control and spike volume while turning the wheel which causes a huge break in concentration leading to an accident. That is absolutely possible and could be extremely dangerous in the right situation.

      • blarth@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        The stereo causing someone to crash the car? That’s just Darwin at work.

        There are falsehoods in the article. Go test drive an ID.4. I have a sneaking suspicion that this is yet another EV hit piece.

        • iamjackflack@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Not really at all. I believe your view is wrong. Just because you believe your high level of intellect makes it impossible for you, you may be forgetting the legion of morons and old people out there driving. Is 100% entirely possible someone could be turning a corner and accidentally does something to cause a distraction and run someone over because they instantly look down away from the road.

          Regardless of the persons intelligence, it absolutely can and almost guaranteed has happened numerous times over humans driving careers. The button style just makes these situations easier to take place.

          Edit - this isn’t a hit piece on EVs, touch capacitive controls suck in general in cars. Physical buttons are always better, easier to press and locate, and do what you need without drawing your attention from driving.

          • blarth@thelemmy.club
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Keep finding your axe against capacitive buttons, I don’t like them either. However, the ID.4 is most definitely not causing more people to crash than other cars. People can accidentally swipe touch controls on steering wheels, too.