I think a little clarification is needed. No. I don’t actually think everyone there is insane. I don’t care about the bans so stop trying to use that. HB enthusiasts coming here and trying to call me out achieves nothing besides proving my point

Edit: Feel free to keep trying to brigade me. It’s not going to scare me to take this down

  • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    3 months ago

    The term “authoritarian” is so fraught that under these circumstances it might as well just mean “opponent of the United States” or “organized at all”.

    The examples you have provided are quite absurd.

    Tiananmen Square (which you misspelled) is indeed poorly understood in The West, including the historical conensus that there was no massacre in the square itself. It is, in fact, historical revisionism to suggest otherwise. In addition, Tiananmen Square is just a place, a very popular one to visit that has been the location for all kinda of events. In China, the events are called the June 4 Incident / events. Calling it “Tiananmen Square” is sometimes a sign that a person is not familiar with the history as they are using the common but misleading term that is virtually only used to forward the previously-mentioned historical revisionism to a Western audience that is in no way interested in understanding.

    Re: Uyghurs, I would suggest that you read into this much more, as the topic is full of misinformation, think tanks with shady ties, fake universities, charlatans pretending to be experts, literal teenagers treated as satellite photography analysis experts, and really weird NGOs, including pro-Trump ones. One good topic to focus on is calling it a genocide at all and how that came to be the discourse. In particular, what The Newlines Institute is, why they were amplified by the US State Departmwnt, their rationale, and, of course, why none of that is taken seriously outside of a very specific political block. Following their members, funding, etc is actually a pretty interesting rabbit trail to follow. Bird’s eye view, the rhetorical treatment of Uyghurs as the subject of genocide was more or less invented, and this is is why you naturally don’t see math death, destruction, refugees, or forced migrations of the Uyghur population. This does not mean bad things haven’t happened there nor that policies were not hamfisted, but just compare how China treated a series of sectarian knife attacks (education, jobs, vocational training, investment, banning extremist Salafist practices) to how the West treated and treats Muslims (invading and killing millions).

    So, anyways, I hope that you can continue your education and engage with these realities in gold faith.

    • wick@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Thanks for posting your thoughts, I don’t get many opportunities to hear tankie brainrot as it’s often purged from my feed before I even open the comments.

      #1 whatever did or did not happen at the specific location of Tiananmen Square doesn’t address that the Chinese government murdered student protestors. Doesn’t matter if it was two blocks over or on the other side of the country. The CCP will use lethal force against protestors.

      #2 a think tank has nothing to do with all the Uyghurs whose family members have disappeared without a trace. The CCP makes people disappear and they offer zero transparency into their judicial process.

      You’re quibbling over minor specifics and ignoring the undisputed parts that are most damning. Stop being a propagandist for a government that doesn’t even align with your proported beliefs just because ”america bad".

      • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Thanks for posting your thoughts, I don’t get many opportunities to hear tankie brainrot as it’s often purged from my feed before I even open the comments.

        I can see already how much of a good faith engagement this will be. Would you be surprised if people reacted negatively to your introduction?

        #1 whatever did or did not happen at the specific location of Tiananmen Square doesn’t address that the Chinese government murdered student protestors.

        What I was doing was pointing out that the most common understanding is an absurdity and historically revisionist. There is plenty more that could be discussed if one wanted to, but the common understanding is a cartoonish falsehood based on memes and not any actual attempt to read and understand. The way that parent made their reference indicated that they shared this false understanding.

        Doesn’t matter if it was two blocks over or on the other side of the country. The CCP will use lethal force against protestors.

        What matters re: the point I made is that there is a conflict with the common mental image and suggests that perhaps a person should recognize when they do not really know something. It might even jostle a person to not reach for the next-worst type of sourcing and instead do a deep-dive that challenges themselves. Wouldn’t want to get caught out like that again, right?

        #2 a think tank has nothing to do with all the Uyghurs whose family members have disappeared without a trace.

        This is the same illogical structue of the previous response. It sounds like what you would really like to say is that there is something related that you think is important so you would like to skip over what I said. Feel free to make another thread with these other points and I can respond to them there.

        You’re quibbling over minor specifics and ignoring the undisputed parts that are most damning.

        Ad I said, the entire narrative shift is based on an absurd propaganda apparatus and not any evidence on the ground. The use of the big G word.

        The fact that OP is repeating this again suggests a lack of investigation. And yet they are so dismissive! I would hope that they might become interested in doing some media criticism. Maybe ask a question. Sometimes people do this and only tell you until much later.

        Stop being a propagandist for a government that doesn’t even align with your proported beliefs just because ”america bad".

        Now you are just making things up.

        • wick@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          All I want to hear from you is an admission that the CCP murdered protestors, and that they jail people without giving families or the international press any contact.

          • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            I.e. you want to shift the conversion to simplistic claims you feel more comfortable with rather than discuss what I have actually said.

            Please engage in good faith.

            • wick@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              I don’t need to engage with a CCP cuck in all their petty talking points to know I don’t want to be a CCP cuck with petty talking points. You do you bro, your life is a joke.

                • wick@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  I could grant you every irrelevant assertion you made about the location of protestor murders, and that BS about think-tanks and it would mean nothing because, again, that has nothing to do with the actual grievances people have with the CCP, which you will never address because you are a complete hack.

                  • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    You say you don’t want to engage, but you keep replying. Can I help you with this is any way?

    • j_overgrens@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      On behalf of my Uyghur friends who haven’t spoken to their parents in years, because they were imprisoned for their children emigrating: fuck you. A really deep, heartfelt fuck you.

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Found one guys!

      Tianmen square test: Failed

      Uyghur test: Failed

      I love this litmus test so much lol.

        • Valmond@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Lol your copy pasted “answer” sounded like Donald Trump tried to wriggle out of a tough question.

          You showed that you don’t accept the Tianmen square massacre, nor the Uyghur massacre. What’s next, denying the holocaust?

          • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Lol your copy pasted “answer”

            Copy pasted? From where?

            sounded like Donald Trump tried to wriggle out of a tough question.

            How so? I’m starting to think you’ve never heard Trump speak.

            You showed that you don’t accept the Tianmen square massacre

            It is historical consensus that there was no massacre at Tiananmen Square and it is revisionist to suggest otherwise, so yes. I stated this very directly.

            nor the Uyghur massacr

            “the Uyghur massacre”, as a term, isn’t a thing. Nobody claims there is something called “The Uyghur Massacre” except you, just now. I don’t want to guess what you’re trying to communicate.

            What’s next, denying the holocaust?

            Exactly the opposite. The absurdities behind labeling China’s treatment of Uyghurs a genocide, which is the thing I’m actually talking about, is so careless that it has the effect of undermining the gravity and crime of actual genocides, including the Holocaust. Have you looked into the topics and groups I mentioned?

            • Valmond@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              See, you are a CCP boot licker denying genocides and massacres.

              Does feel like it’s AI generated though…

                  • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    None of my answers were random, they were direct responses to what you said, complete with quotes so that you can follow the logic.

                    Let me know when you are ready to engage with what I’ve said.

      • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        They didn’t mention it so why would I address it? You don’t seem particularly ready to have a good faith discussion, either.

        • pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          oh noes the tankie is scwared thwat his narwatiwe of genocide deniwal is being exposed as stupid. now get blocked as i have to gamble gold in roblox flying skibidi toilet tycoon