• davel [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    MMT is just a description of how fiat monetary sovereignty works. It’s not prescriptive, and it’s not comprehensive. For instance, it says nothing about international trade / international balance of payments / currency exchange.

    Liberals, being liberals, take this description, expand it in liberal ways, add liberal prescriptions, and then call that mess—which can’t work—MMT as well.

    Michael Hudson: The Use and Abuse of MMT

    J.T. does a decent job toward the end of his video to explain to the liberal audience how the bourgeoisie will severely limit what they naïvely & over-exuberantly imagine can be done with money printer go brrr: Why The Government Has Infinite Money

    • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think this is a good summary of my position as well. MMT as a description of how it works is far better than the dominant ideological description of how it works. Reasoning from that to prescriptions must always, inherently, be experimental and that means until MMT theorists get control of monetary policy, all prescriptions are going to be suspect.

      Unfortunately, liberals and conservatives alike have no interest in scientific politics.

      • davel [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        The Chinese state has control, and I try a little to see what they do with it, holding MMT in the back of my mind, to see how well it holds up.