☀️
Why, even FOSS needs support. See OBS Studio, Wikipedia etc. Without supports good projects go to waste.
We are not talking about MS who introduce ads in Explorer which need some ad-blocking, hosts or registry hacks. Linux is more transparent and there will be options to control this.
Do I like it, nope. But it is better than alternatives to shutdown project because lack of funding or struggling to expand because only few people are willingly to donate.
You got busted that you lied. How is that slander if is true.
Why not address this, create another post answer and respond to it. I was not involved in all of this and do not care much about this at all, my opinion on PCIO, GrapheneOS is well-known.
I have not checked all points but OP has some valid points, if you like it or not.
Blocked you know, you can do the same. But do not call me someone who slander others, this is seriously not the case, I at worst mock them, but this is well-known.
That is all I am going to say here.
It is not really slandering. If you check their statements regarding developers, they deserve much worse. If I would leak what they said on Reddit and via Reddit DM, that would be slandering, even if it is true.
Edit… really… 😂
👇😂
PrivacyClowns are amateurs.
Skip them and follow me, you learn much more within 1 week or money back… kek. I do not censor legit submissions, never have, and never will.
I find such accusations without anything behind pretty harsh.
EFF is not a transparent organization…
but what they are supposed to be is an activist organisation to fight for privacy, not some political analyst on a TV show…
Eff has some campaigns running and did so in the past. Campaign that people paid for and they were pretty transparent because they report about all won and lost battles. They have social media, you can ask and contact them over there too. Not sure what your definition of transparent is.
Can we go back to topic, I think the Cambridge thing is already over and Facebook had his worst year in 2021. I do not like hijacking threads like this. I also do not like to smear someones entire reputation based on one or two things some people did, this is not how things should be handled. Name someone without any flaws, that would be real news and a big bummer. If you dig for dirt you always find some, on every side.
I do not backup EFF on every move they do or did, it also was only an example on who you can support with eg donations.
Now tell me what campaigns you running as private person … oh whoops none… Full circle.
They created their Privacy Badger extension + spread their DnT philosophy, regardless if it is helpful or not.
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/03/one-answer-facebook-problem-block-its-tracking-technologies
Talked a lot about the leak
Direct response
I think they responded a lot to Facebook, the entire scandal and started some campaigns to sue Zuck and co.
Here is what people could do
My opinion on the submission and Tech + Web, not meant to offend but my little review on this.
It was made by a free speech company that supported neo-nazis and white supremacists. They also wanted to replace the coin system.
Brave never threatened anyone.