• 0 Posts
  • 64 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 10th, 2023

help-circle












  • They ruled that people acting together have all the same rights that they would have acting individually

    Bullshit, corporations are not “people acting together”, they’re autocratic command structures where one or few people hold all the power.

    preventing someone from spending money on producing and promoting their speech effectively prevents them from being heard

    Also total bullshit, unless you agree that allowing people to be poor is a violation of the first amendment, because being poor effectively prevents them from being heard. Which you won’t.

    Which are both perfectly true, common-sense statements

    I’m already confident you don’t have a single ounce of common sense in your empty head after reading those two sentences.


  • They ruled that people acting together have all the same rights that they would have acting individually

    Bullshit, corporations are not “people acting together”, they’re autocratic command structures where one or few people hold all the power.

    preventing someone from spending money on producing and promoting their speech effectively prevents them from being heard

    Also total bullshit, unless you agree that allowing people to be poor is a violation of the first amendment, because being poor effectively prevents them from being heard. Which you won’t.

    Which are both perfectly true, common-sense statements

    I’m already confident you don’t have a single ounce of common sense in your empty head after reading those two sentences.



  • FaeDrifter@midwest.socialtoPrivacy@lemmy.mlPrivacy = no free speech
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    CU vs FEC was specifically about campaign financing, but yeah basically ruled that organizations like corporations are protected by 1A, and money counts as free speech.

    Which is obviously bullshit on every level, but just one way that a SCOTUS with a few corrupt individuals can destroy democracy for an entire country.



  • FaeDrifter@midwest.socialtoLinux@lemmy.mlI had a journey
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Communists today are using all the same materials and asking people to read works like The State and Revolution, the Manifesto, and so on. I’m not sure what you think is so different about messaging today from the messaging in the past.

    The difference is that we live in the present, not the past, and the present is a lot different than the past.

    The communist manifesto was brilliant because Marx and Engels wrote it specifically for the average working class people of their time. It wouldn’t have worked if they wrote it for people almost 200 years past.

    Let go of the history and tradition. I’m not asking anyone to write a new communist manifesto of the 21st century, but talk to people like you live in 2023, not a cult of tradition. Embrace modernity.

    but the fact that most people in the west have been generally happy to keep capitalism and ignore its problems

    Lol, no. Open your eyes up, Westerners hate capitalism, they mostly just don’t know yet that it’s capitalism at the source of their problems. People are exhausted at the idea of the iPhone 16 Max Pro Plus X Series, they just want to make a fair living wage to provide for their family, and have time to spend with their family. If you can offer a home, healthy food, medical care, and education at 32 work hours per week, you are sold to almost everyone in the US.


  • FaeDrifter@midwest.socialtoLinux@lemmy.mlI had a journey
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Your two quotes are referring to two different survey counts. Let me explain how this works: it’s impossible to get an exact count down to every individual, you survey a population sample and then make estimates based on your population sample. This can be done by both government and private agencies.

    Here are the two different surveys from the article broken down:

    The NSSO survey, done by the Indian government, not officially released, but leaked to the media. All this article tells us about the results of this survey is that “poverty had increased”. No years, no numbers, no percentages. Just three words.

    The CMIE survey, done by a private company, used by the World Bank. We at least have the numbers for this survey, which says poverty has more than halved from 2011 to 2019. However, the World Bank already assumed that poverty would be decreasing rapidly, and put out global poverty estimations based on rapidly decreasing poverty before

    When you quoted the World Bank as saying

    The global poverty headcount in 2018 is revised slightly up from 8.7 to 8.9 per cent

    That was referring to CMIE survey results being less optimistic than original World Bank projections.

    I did make a mistake, I didn’t credit you for the NSSO survey, which did indeed support your point. I think that’s why you misread the conclusion of the CMIE survey. I think it’s sus af the government won’t release it, but I’m also a scientist. All we have from it is, “poverty had increased”. Imagine I presented to you a new article that said nothing about poverty rates in China except “poverty had increased”, how much would you value that piece of information?


  • FaeDrifter@midwest.socialtoLinux@lemmy.mlI had a journey
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Let’s be honest, you would’ve been saying that communist messaging sucks when the Soviet revolution happened too.

    Absolutely not, and the Communist Manifesto was a brilliant piece of writing. These are communists who knew how to speak to people’s frustrations and desires.

    So I amend my claim, I was wrong. Communists in the past were great at messaging, communists alive today suck at messaging.