The bet was that bigger compute gave more parameters which gave exponentially better intelligence.

Unfortunately the increase in intelligence is logarithmic under current methods, so the business model is unsustainable.

What if I’m ugly.

Or in clown costume.

Or going to a Kiss tribute concert

Etc.

Nom nom nom nom

This is a good explanation

iOS uses freeBSD and OpenBSD components. Isn’t that the same thing?

The advantage of datacenters in space is that the peasants can’t break in and sabotage your equipment.

If that’s your criteria, put servers in containers and sink them in the ocean. Bonus, no cooling problems.

https://www.creativebloq.com/3d/video-game-design/unreal-engines-ai-push-sparks-backlash-as-developers-fear-the-end-of-blueprints

Why do people think that gta6 content will be stored locally?

Or the head of intelligence

Snowden had applied for asylum in Ecuador, he went to Russia for connecting flights to Latin America.

He couldn’t leave. Even the Bolivian presidential plane had to land in Austria after false rumors circulated that Snowden was aboard the aircraft.

exaggeration is acceptable as long as the general idea is true,

Totally disagree. If the goal is to influence someone’s opinion, in any forum, then it will remain their opinion longer if it solidly fact based, without exaggeration.

even hyperbolic exaggeration.

Obvious hyperbolic statements can be very useful. They increase enjoyment for the billions of lemmy readers and make them more receptive.

Conversations don’t stop and wait for you to look up something that ultimately is at best a minor correction

However, in this format that luxury exists.

because it’s not needed and frankly its silly.

It is needed because otherwise it damages the argument.

Constantly moving goal posts in order to discredit a true fact because the way it was presented is not precise.

If you notice, my contributions have not touched any goalposts. Encouraging accuracy is not changing the argument.

Which is what?

Note, I’m not disagreeing with the guy. I’m helping them make better arguments.

If you want to argue scientifically, you have to be precise.

My point stands

But your stats are from your ass.

Camera is needed for this

An inward facing eye camera is not an issue.

Elon knows it’s too expensive to incorporate lidar data into his product line.

My spelling was way odd. I mean Etymology.

Clarkson got in trouble for noticing a slant on a bridge. I didn’t even realise he was being offensive.

I was going to talk about shortening of Nigeria, but apparently the entomology is completely separate.

How about number of GPUs as a metric. The more, the worse the datacenter?