

♻️




$ paru -Syuu, correct (extra u at the end)?
I know you’re joking,
Press X to Doubt
but what’s your plan when it comes time to “reduce” the children? Gas chambers? Firing squads? Strangle them as you look into their eyes?


I’ll piggyback onto this comment and advocate for FUTO. I have it installed on my Pixel 7 running Graphene and also an old LG G7 ThinQ running LineageOS. Works like a charm, has every feature I could want, and it has support for every language I speak (English, Dutch, Spanish, Japanese, haven’t looked to see if it has Hindi support, however).


“One can give you a great recipe. You can still fuck it up.”


The Abrahamic Religions (Islam, Christianity, and Judaism) aren’t “religions of peace”.
Socialist economic systems are also easily corruptible.
People are perfectly fine with letting strangers suffer so long as it doesn’t inconvenience them.
And yet… you still… never mind. Not worth it.


Ah, my kith and kin. Salutations, ye of excellent discerning taste.

You’re using a logical fallacy called reductio ad absurdum. You take my interpretation of Linux’s definition to an extreme to make it look ridiculous.
To be fair to you and remain taxonomically accurate, the linux kernel is a system of algorithms, which (to be fair to me) can be considered an algorithm (the main loop) of algorithms.
The linux kernel, given my very pedestrian understanding of it, is a program that allows other programs (e.g., GNU utilities) to talk to a computer system’s hardware.
Therefore, linux could be considered a collection of algorithms that can be modularly compiled to handle:
You forgot the -v flag to watch your dreams die in real time!


S-Tier ELID (“explain like I’m dumb”); thank you for your service.
bobbelbubble
Or… was… that the joke?


“Neutral” is meant for the members of the oligarchy, not you and me.


Why are their question marks at the end of your sentences? Are you posing those questions to me? Are you trying to illustrate some sort of vocal inflection? If so, then that’s even more confusing.


It’s a well-known figure of speech.


When you say “AI”, do you mean a large language model?
Then, no. A language model is not super intelligent.
Also, with respect to any artificial intelligence created by human beings in general, no. It is only designed to make predictions of text based on training on a corpus of text which is ultimately composed by a human mind or many human minds that are very fallible, prone to delusions, and also unaware of broader realities and dimensions of existence.
There’s far better bourbon out there, seniors.