Good point, I forgot it was a survey.

20% being fine with it is still worrying to me.

The unsafe rust keyword basically just lets you declare a scope in which some memory checks do not need to pass for the program to compile.

The only old software I’ve installed worked fine but I also compiled it myself. Which was quick because of the comparatively small codebases.

Who would sacrifice Christopher Street Day for an SSD? Not even worth debating.

So 64 is absolutely perfect being 1000000 in binary, then all you need to do is go one bit a time for a binary search.

Yeees

Hai :3

Isn’t Chrome the one known for sharing data?

I’ve been using primarily LibreWolf for almost a year and have not had any trouble using just Firefox based browsers for over three years. (Before then I needed Chromium for M$ teams occasionally)

And with RFP on by default.

Any particular technical reason?

I’ve done that in C before. I was just confused because the labels need to be in scope of a function as far as I am aware. In assembly you don’t really have that.

Or perhaps call function if you’ve got a call stack going.

Nevermind that is C or something right? Otherwise it would be jmp function?

That’s a cool looking keyboard!

Why oh why did you mention that.

Wut

ahem Catgirls in great quantities are a feature!

Having a program that draws pretty things as a wallpaper.

Yes. I left a USB stick with a Linux installer on the table when they tried to upgrade to Windows 11. The upgrade failed and they instead upgraded to Linux without even needing to ask for help :>

Huh, that is what I’m used to but my app manages it in line as well though normally I would do inline code like this anyways.