I received it as well but there is a “privacy notice” underlined link at the bottom and you can read it there.

I have them blocked on Steam. I don’t care what comes from them, it’s not worth it.

When I saw what the list was about, Lost was the first series that came to mind.

Vista, that’s what ruined it for me. I had XP Pro, and I loved that it had all the features (IIS, FTP Server, etc.). But when Vista came out, it had so many different versions, each one a gatekeeper for different features. That was just too much. XP was the last one I used for my personal use. I jumped into Linux, head first, and I’ve never looked back.

Windows XP. The moment I realized the mess Windows Vista was going to be, I knew I had to switch over.

We will continue as usual. I use Arch BTW. 🤣

Keep it rolling!

Please don’t.

Check the documentation to see which driver supports your hardware before trying.

Once you have the correct driver, test to see if it is working properly, there are a few commands to do this.

No. I am historicizing both LGBT people and Islam. I am saying that queerphobia and Islamaphobia are not the same. They have interactions of course, like all social phenomena does, but they are qualitatively different and have different responses.

Correct, definitively not the same, islamophobia won’t legally put you in jail for up to 20 years.

You are set on target, you can see the point when talking about the Quran, that then it’s ok to speak up, even if the country in which it happened, allows for the burning to happen. But then, when it comes to LGBT, the country’s law must be respected and you can’t talk about it.

Your stance is different than mine. I see that in both scenarios, there is work to be done to improve the current situation for both and that expressing your concerns should be acceptable. But what you are stating would seem to indicate that this is only acceptable when the Quran is affected but not the LGBT community. If Quran, speak up, is LGBT, shut up and don’t interfere.

Also you seem to think that I believe that it’s culturally impossible for Malays to accept LGBT people. That isn’t my point. My point is that for acceptance to occur it means 0 meddling from the Global North of Global South affairs.

This is not what I’m saying, I’m saying that is Singapore can do it, Malaysia should be able to do it within a comparable period of time.

That contradiction you mentioned, then needs to be worked on now. Maybe there is no rush for those who are not part of the affected minority. I’m pretty sure that if you were, you’d be wanting to have this discussion moving as it is in Singapore.

If let’s say you were living in a country where Islam was a minority and burning the Quran was legal, wouldn’t you want to have a conversation started and hope that there was some progress for your situation as well? What would you think if others in that country were to say that Türkiye protesting on your behalf would be comparable to supporting jihadist and that should not be allowed?

It seems there is reason for the LGBT community to be mad at a government that had done little to nothing to improve the situation. Culturally, Malaysia and Singapore are sister countries, in historical times, they were only recently separated (not even 100 years yet). Not comparable with Hong Kong because Malaysia and Singapore where not given to another country that had different cultural values. They both became independent on their own. If Singapore can talk and make progress for the LGBT community, so could Malaysia.

Malays live in Singapore, same race as the Malays that live in Malaysia different citizenship only. If a Malay Mufti in Singapore can see a way forward for this issue, I’m sure they same should be possible in Malaysia.

Singapore’s Mufti seems to be more understanding of the situation. Why can’t Malaysia try a more sensible approach?

Both countries share the same history (both were British colonies for example), believes and culture yet their stance is so different.

Singapore seems better at managing a multicultural society than Malaysia does. Not just on the LGBT aspect but on how they treat one another regardless of their race as well.

It seems that management is what results in Singapore thriving as it has.

CNA Interviews Singapore’s Mufti on LGBT issues

There was a way around it however but not something everyone will be able to do with their home router. I had to ssh to the router using ISP admin credentials leaked on the internet, then create a file in init.d that loads a custom iptables file with the firewall rules I needed for IPv6. NAT for IPv6 however was not supported by the kennel used for my router.

This is correct. My router however doesn’t have that level of firewall. It’s either all allowed or nothing is.

The router does have a firewall but it blocks everything inbound by default. Some routers (at least mine) do not offer the granularity to filter traffic for certain devices (no NAT either). It’s either allow all in or nothing.

When you enable IPv6 and switch off the firewall (since you can’t host anything otherwise), every device becomes exposed to the internet.

Then unless the devices have a firewall themselves, all is exposed. Not just the web services, ssh and the rest as well.

Because devices in your LAN will all be accessible from the internet with IPv6, you need to firewall every device.

It becomes more of a problem for IoT devices which you can’t really control. If you can, disable ipv6 for those.

If you switch to Arch, this is waiting for you in AUR 😊.

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/joliebulle