I don’t know what “Figma” is but it sounds stupid.

Jesus. Citation seriously needed.

I agree, we need more words. We lose words all the time, too, due to assumptive abuse.

…We have all the answers, resources, and manpower. That’s crazy-obvious. The problem is we aren’t implementing them because that’s spending money on people who won’t get people (or at least, the individuals) a profit in return. AI can tell you stuff all you want, but if you’re too greedy to implement it, then, well…

Imagine having such a mind-boggling, unfathomable amount of money to waste, and using it to exploit work instead of making sure people aren’t starving or one foot in homelessness.

I laughed so hard at this, thanks

Damn that HR!

That’s not how you use “touché”. Pet peeve of mine.

As a person who is not an advanced pirate, I’m reading the Jackett page and I have no idea what it is or how it works.

Yeah, came here to compare. Both are wrong. If you wish to be a writer, write. If you wish to be a good writer, learn something. Same with programming, except programming requires something to function so it’s even worse in that regard.

I just looked at your profile, and man I have not seen anyone have such a strong downvote count. I mean, I don’t look at profiles a lot, but still. You’re a politically-edgy little bastard, aren’t you?

Your response posts keep getting more and more desperate, lol

Well, I can see that someone who moves the goalposts this often isn’t worth arguing with. Maybe just state the point you really want to make the first time instead of being sheepish about it?

Also, “slacktivism”? Man, I can’t take you seriously. How hilarious would it be though— you’re so quick to assume people don’t do anything but argue on the internet, someone’s gonna show you up someday. You honestly sound a whole lot like you’re projecting about “slacktivism”. But oh well, onto reading the next Lemmy post.

You’re kind of an idiot, aren’t you?

Why are you arguing when you know you don’t know what they’re talking about, and a quick Google search can verify what they’re saying? Or are you just playing stupid?

How does it compare to Affinity?

Okay, but… it’s just a page. Try building a store or something like Lemmy with just static HTML and only enough CSS to make larger or bolder fonts and see where that gets you.

Google is bad, but nuance in your argument is still important.

Same, Bulbapedia is great.

I know I’m going to get downvoted for this, but “modern UI” doesn’t have to suck. It’s just that a lot of companies don’t give a shit. Modern design is about accessibility— about the ease of finding and using things (including general readability). Google and many others have violated these principles with their “modern” UIs. People shouldn’t say “modern bad”, they should say “Google bad”.

Serebii.net on the other hand is “old web”— and man is it an unusable, unreadable, un-navigatable, overwhelming piece of crap. And I will take that opinion to the grave. Both Google and Serebii.net can be awful, fam.

You don’t know anything about how technology or even communication works then.