4·
1 day agoThis bug affects 10 people
There were shadowy conspiracists lurking in the dark alleys of Washington, and hiding from the glaring sun in the High Desert of California, but they were laughably easy prey when the Martian lizard people, the subterranean Vril-empowered mole-men, and the globalist pedophile Commies did show up.
- 12 Posts
- 578 Comments
Joined 4 months ago
Cake day: July 15th, 2024
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
sudo traceroute 1.1.1.1can show you how far your connection request gets (whether it’s blocked by your pc, your router, or somewhere on the internet).
You may have to install it first.sudo find /etc -name *wg*
find ~ -name *wg*can help find left-over config files.
676·2 days agoWhy is his political opinion important for a Christmas present? Just give him something he’d like.
Yeah, when you use Arch, you may not pay in money, but you are going to pay, lol.
Condensation can only happen on the inside of the bottle if it was opened.
You can dance around the issue as much as you like, there is no magic involved here.
Your partner does drink.
your roommates are drinking it.
Yeah, but you’re going to pay for that.
Putting a bunch of recipients in bcc to send out mass mail is what spammers do.
So if you also do this, you’ll look like a spammer.
This may lead to your emails getting rejected by various mail servers in the future.
Waiting… [2005]
2·3 days agoObviously, yes. My point is: Do you read and understand all changes in the code for each update? You need to trust the maintainers, cause they could theoretically push out any code with the update.
That’s not what I’m saying.
I’m saying you need to trust the people making your OS cause no way in hell is anyone else able to audit every update they push.
Whether your OS is trustworthy depends on their history. In that regard, I’d give Ubuntu a solid B-
Yes, they’re taking the source code from upstream, modifying (“patching”) it, compiling it, then uploading their compiled binaries to the Ubuntu repo where your system downloads them during an update.
You can technically download the source code as well, if you activate the source repo. But hardly any end user does. And the source code you get doesn’t compile to the same binary you get from the repo anyway. (This would be called a “reproducible build”. Some distros try to be reproducible. Ubuntu doesn’t, they have other priorities.)
You trust their repos.
With every apt update, they could push whatever code they want onto your PC.
Same as with literally any binary-based OS.
So can Canonical. The difference is, they don’t.
Bro, several people bricked their pc that way. I’m no expert, just throwing out a warning not to do dumb shit.
Just don’t use it for mass mailing external addresses. That’ll get you on a blacklist faster than you’d think.
When your recipient can “reply all”, that means you’ve exposed every recipient’s email address to all recipients.
At that point, “reply all” is just a convenience, without it they could just copy-paste the email addresses manually.If you want to suppress that, don’t show everyone the email address of everyone else.
For internal mail, you can use BCC. For external, use a mailer service.
My favorite is a really minimal Gnome on Debian:
This gives me a Gnome shell with no visible GUI apps in the menu, except for the settings, terminal, file manager and network manager.
Now I fill up my hard drive with FlatPaks ;)
I prefer Gnome cause it has fewer options, the overview works really well on a notebook with touchpad, and I like that it is more unique.